A) still liable since she had to disaffirm before her 18th birthday.
B) still liable because selling the skis amounted to a ratification.
C) still liable because she used the skis.
D) not liable because skis are not necessaries.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) a minor may not disaffirm an agreement signed by a parent.
B) the disaffirmance of an agreement by a minor does not operate to terminate the contractual obligations of the parent who signed the agreement.
C) Craig could not disaffirm the contract to secure personal management services because it was a contract to provide his and his family's necessaries.
D) Craig, an infant, could not disaffirm in this case because it would cause undue hardship on the other party.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) ratification.
B) disaffirmance.
C) ab initio.
D) restitution.
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) If an intoxicated person is unable to understand the nature and consequences of his act, then the contract is voidable.
B) The effect of intoxication is generally the same as that given to contracts that are voidable because of incompetency.
C) Slight intoxication will destroy one's contractual capacity.
D) To make a contract voidable, a person need not be so drunk that he is totally without reason or understanding.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) An incompetent person is liable for necessaries.
B) Unlike a minor, an incompetent person can never ratify a contract.
C) To avoid a contract, a person need not be permanently incompetent.
D) Under the cognitive ability test, a person is incompetent if he is unable to understand the nature and effect of his act.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) If there is a conflict, the store's return policy will override Marsha's right of disaffirmation.
B) In most jurisdictions, Marsha may get her money back only if she has not opened or damaged the merchandise in any way.
C) In a majority of jurisdictions, Marsha may get her money back even if she cannot return the merchandise.
D) In most jurisdictions, Marsha may get some of her money back but she must pay the reasonable value of the goods if that differs from the contract price.
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 1 - 20 of 75
Related Exams