Filters
Question type

Study Flashcards

Fay,age 17,ordered a pair of skis on the installment plan.She paid $20 every month until she turned 18,the age of majority.The next day,she sold the skis to Sharon and disaffirmed the contract.Fay is:


A) still liable since she had to disaffirm before her 18th birthday.
B) still liable because selling the skis amounted to a ratification.
C) still liable because she used the skis.
D) not liable because skis are not necessaries.

E) All of the above
F) None of the above

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Disaffirmance must be express; it may not be implied.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In Berg v.Traylor,the court found that:


A) a minor may not disaffirm an agreement signed by a parent.
B) the disaffirmance of an agreement by a minor does not operate to terminate the contractual obligations of the parent who signed the agreement.
C) Craig could not disaffirm the contract to secure personal management services because it was a contract to provide his and his family's necessaries.
D) Craig, an infant, could not disaffirm in this case because it would cause undue hardship on the other party.

E) A) and B)
F) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Mel is 17 years old but looks older than 18.He makes a contract to buy a car from Maisie,who is the age of majority.When Maisie finds out Mel's age,she may avoid the contract even if Mel did not misrepresent his age.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In some states,minors are liable for contracts involving bank accounts and student loans and cannot avoid these contracts even though they can avoid other types of contracts.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The minority of states require that the minor,when effecting a disaffirmance of the contract,pay at least a reasonable amount for the use of the property or the amount by which the property depreciated while in the hands of a minor.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The exercise of the power to avoid a contract is known as:


A) ratification.
B) disaffirmance.
C) ab initio.
D) restitution.

E) C) and D)
F) None of the above

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Cheryl is a 17-year-old high school student who was elected homecoming queen and does part-time modeling to earn money for college.She has an important interview with a modeling agency and wants to make a good impression,so she withdraws $5,000 from her savings and buys a designer outfit and a fur coat for the interview.A week later,she returns the coat to the department store and says she would like her money back.The store is reluctant to take the items.What are Cheryl's rights?

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The issue is whether the coat is a necessary item for Cheryl under the circumstances.Although it is true that Cheryl has the right to avoid the contract because she is a minor,she is responsible for the reasonable value of necessary items.Because she is employed as a model,the coat may be found to be a necessary item for her and,if so,she is liable for the reasonable value of it since the sale of the coat is an executed contract.

Michael is 17 years old and earns extra money by repairing cars.Nathan,who is 21,brings his car to Michael for repairs,and Michael ruins the brake system of the car because of his inexperience.If Nathan sues Michael for negligence in performing the auto repair contract,in most states Michael will have no liability,because the tort of negligence and the auto repair contract are connected.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

True

What are the two tests for mental competency?

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

One test is the cognitive ability test.U...

View Answer

Discuss a minor's duty to a seller upon disaffirmance of a contract for the sale of goods.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Courts do not agree on how to handle a m...

View Answer

Ratification makes a contract void from the beginning.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

False

Harold,a minor,decided to trade his 1992 truck on a new car at the local dealership.One week after driving the new car,Harold decides that he cannot afford the payments.Harold now wishes to disaffirm his purchase and get his old truck back.The dealer informs Harold that the truck has been sold.Can Harold get the old truck back and disaffirm his contract with the dealer?

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A contract is voidable at a minor's opti...

View Answer

All states agree that a minor who has fraudulently misrepresented her age when entering into a contract has no power to disaffirm the contract.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Seventeen-year-old Teresa wants to disaffirm her student loan agreements.In most states,she will not be allowed to do so.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following is untrue regarding the contracts of intoxicated persons?


A) If an intoxicated person is unable to understand the nature and consequences of his act, then the contract is voidable.
B) The effect of intoxication is generally the same as that given to contracts that are voidable because of incompetency.
C) Slight intoxication will destroy one's contractual capacity.
D) To make a contract voidable, a person need not be so drunk that he is totally without reason or understanding.

E) None of the above
F) A) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

An automobile will never be considered be a necessary item for a minor.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A mental condition that impairs a person's ability to act in a reasonable manner is one type of mental incompetence.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following is untrue regarding the contracts of incompetent persons?


A) An incompetent person is liable for necessaries.
B) Unlike a minor, an incompetent person can never ratify a contract.
C) To avoid a contract, a person need not be permanently incompetent.
D) Under the cognitive ability test, a person is incompetent if he is unable to understand the nature and effect of his act.

E) A) and B)
F) All of the above

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Fourteen-year-old Marsha bought $120 worth of video games at a local store,using her own money.Her parents insisted that she return the items and get her money back.Which of the following is true?


A) If there is a conflict, the store's return policy will override Marsha's right of disaffirmation.
B) In most jurisdictions, Marsha may get her money back only if she has not opened or damaged the merchandise in any way.
C) In a majority of jurisdictions, Marsha may get her money back even if she cannot return the merchandise.
D) In most jurisdictions, Marsha may get some of her money back but she must pay the reasonable value of the goods if that differs from the contract price.

E) A) and C)
F) A) and B)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Showing 1 - 20 of 75

Related Exams

Show Answer